How an off-field battle played a role in the underarm delivery

One of the most infamous deliveries in the history of the game came at a time of significant upheaval in Australian cricket

01-Feb-2021 Bradman & Packer: The Deal That Changed Cricket, Greg Chappell has a simple way of summing up the change in the game over the Australian summers that followed – a recitation of how much cricket he found himself playing before, during and after WSC [World Series Cricket]. In 1976-77, pre-WSC, he walked onto the field for 42 days of cricket, including two one-day matches. Wearing the WSC cap, he turned out for 44 and 43 days, with a far higher proportion of one-dayers (14 and 28). It was for this sort of summer’s work that the players had been seeking a better deal in the first place.”We weren’t looking to become professional cricketers in the sense of playing cricket full-time,” he says. “We still fully expected and probably wanted to have a career outside of cricket, but we just wanted a better return. When you’re committing anywhere between six and nine months of the year to cricket, for a lot of the guys that was their sole income, so it was pretty tough. That’s why blokes were finishing up in their mid- to late-20s, particularly if they had a family they just couldn’t afford to keep doing it.”But when peace arrived, Chappell found himself confronted with a schedule that felt rather a lot like serving two masters. In 1979-80, his calendar featured 46 days of long-form cricket and 10 of one-day matches, a figure reduced by Australia’s failure to qualify for the World Series Cup finals. Even so, back-to-back Tests was a concept learned the hard way: twice in 1979-80, two full Test matches were separated by the bare minimum of one day to travel from city to city. The following summer, Chappell found himself playing 62 days of Test and first-class cricket, plus no fewer than 18 one-day games; in the space of five seasons, his playing demands had effectively doubled, though the length of season itself had not.”The first season after WSC we were playing alternate Test matches against West Indies and England,” Chappell says. “Bruce Laird had his hand broken against the West Indies and couldn’t play against England. We couldn’t understand why England would get the benefit of what West Indies had done. We were playing Test matches intertwined with one-day games, there was no flow to the season, adjusting from one format to another. We played all the double-headers in the one-day matches– Saturday and Sunday we were playing two days in a row. It was hard enough from the playing point of view but exceedingly demanding from a captaincy point of view. Two one-day games in a row were physically and mentally more demanding than a Test match. The workload on key players was immense, and towards the end of a season they were pretty much exhausted.”

“By the time Chappell had regained some small measure of public esteem by making 87 to guide his team home in the decisive fourth final on the Tuesday night, the prospect of any further underarms had been written out of existence in the World Series Cup playing conditions.”

Professionalism had hit Australia’s cricketers hard. Where they once imagined themselves playing and practising more like golfers, they found the new deal to resemble that of a sweatshop, which just so happens to be a useful way of describing the MCG on Sunday, 1 February, 1981. Chappell’s decision to direct his brother Trevor to bowl an underarm delivery to spoil any chance of a New Zealand victory has been dissected at length since, but it cannot be divorced from the explosion in the demands on Australia’s cricketers. Chappell, a tired professional, and frustrated by the poor state of the MCG square, made a call designed to earn an extra day or two off for him and his team.Those at the ground have recalled the selector Sam Loxton’s tears at what had taken place, but it was Richie Benaud’s excoriation of Chappell’s captaincy that, via the Nine broadcast, has been seared into many more memories: “I think it was a disgraceful performance from a captain who got his sums wrong today, and I think it should never be permitted to happen again. We keep reading and hearing that the players are under a lot of pressure, and that they’re tired and jaded and perhaps their judgment and skill is blunted. Perhaps they might advance that as an excuse for what happened out there today. Not with me they don’t. I think it was a very poor performance, one of the worst things I have ever seen done on a cricket field. Goodnight.”It was to be Bradman, ears still ringing from those sentiments, who retired to his study at 2 Holden Street to hurriedly amend the World Series Cup playing conditions for the Board ahead of the next match of the finals series, to be played in Sydney – a favour, perhaps, for his fellow SACA committeeman and by then ACB chairman Phil Ridings. By the time Chappell had regained some small measure of public esteem by making 87 to guide his team home in the decisive fourth final on the Tuesday night, the prospect of any further underarms had been written out of existence in the World Series Cup playing conditions.What had not, however, were PBL’s [Publishing and Broadcasting Limited] scheduling demands, which came with the stinging knowledge for the ACB that every match under the minimum “15 preliminaries and five finals” World Series Cup model required the Board to pay a fee in recognition of the shortfall. After England had baulked at PBL’s 15/5 outline for the previous season, the one-day tournament had been reduced to 12 qualifying matches and a best-of- three finals. The underarm incident came at the end of the first summer in which the 12/3 tournament was played.Chappell’s frustration with the program was clear. “As I tried to explain to them at the time, your business depends on us having a reasonable amount of success, and everything in the programming is working against us being successful over the long term,” Chappell says. “We need to sit down and talk about how we can make it more equitable. The opposition teams were playing three Test matches and we were playing six. We were having problems with the MCG pitch – 1977 was the last decent pitch I played on in my career at the MCG. It was just a mess for the next seven years.Forty years on, the incident is still talked about•Associated Press”We were told, ‘Oh well it’s the same for all teams’. Well it’s not because we play there twice as much as everyone else. ‘Well you’re making the same scores at the MCG as you’re making elsewhere’. But you’re missing the point: on a big ground like that, if we had a decent pitch we’d be making 50 per cent more runs on that ground than we would be elsewhere. You want to have something that’s entertaining, and you’re making us play on something that is very difficult to entertain on.”Chappell’s meetings with [David] Richards, [Lynton] Taylor, Ridings and others, whether as part of the cricket committee or solo as the national captain, seemed, to him, to go around in circles. What he interpreted to be a lack of interest in helping the players with their many complaints could now be seen as an inability on the Board’s side to change many of the stipulations inked into the PBL peace treaty. And Chappell would reason that even if the players had taken a greater consulting role in the terms that were ultimately struck, they would have been doing so without genuine awareness of what lay ahead.”I was meeting with David Richards on what almost seemed like a daily basis–very regularly. Every time I saw him we had discussions around those sorts of issues, and I got the distinct impression – not from David, who I thought genuinely tried to help us – there was an overhang of the old attitude that they’re players, they should just get on with playing and we’ll do the administering. They just didn’t understand either before or after World Series Cricket that what they did had a huge impact on us. We certainly had more input, we had a players’ committee, but I don’t know how much influence we had on the big decisions. I think the smaller stuff, sure, but the deal had been done behind closed doors.”Rather than pushing himself further, Chappell chose to partially withdraw. He resigned the post of selector handed to him as one of the terms of the peace treaty, and did not venture to England for the 1981 Ashes tour, heralding an unhappy period of shared captaincy with Kim Hughes, the establishment’s choice as leader over the eminently capable but outspoken Rod Marsh. is published by the Slattery Media Group

From 'total chaos', Mumbai become Mumbai again

The inside story of a champion team’s phoenix-like rise to win their fourth domestic 50-over title

Shashank Kishore16-Mar-2021Even as Mumbai sank to four defeats in five matches at the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, things were going from bad to worse at the Mumbai Cricket Association, whose scrap with the Cricket Improvement Committee was out in the open. Who the coach would be was a big bone of contention.It wouldn’t be Amit Pagnis. He was done after the T20 tournament. So, Ramesh Powar, after a convoluted and messy process, took charge 48 hours after the team was to depart for the Vijay Hazare Trophy. He has now helmed Mumbai to their fourth domestic 50-overs title.Powar’s appointment meant Mumbai had a fourth coach in the last three years. Pagnis, his predecessor, had been a late replacement for former wicketkeeper Vinayak Samant, under whom they won the Vijay Hazare Trophy in 2018-19 but had a poor Ranji Trophy. Samant had been brought in after Sameer Dighe was let go after one season. The churn threatened to take the focus completely away from the cricket.Even as the MCA and the CIC squabbled in full public view, Aditya Tare, one of their senior players, found to his shock that he had been given no explanation for his omission from the Vijay Hazare Trophy longlist. It wasn’t until Powar’s intervention that Tare was picked again. On Sunday, Tare scored his maiden List-A century in a tall chase as Mumbai beat Uttar Pradesh in the final to break a streak of six tournaments without a trophy. It capped a remarkable turnaround for a team that appeared to have been in the doldrums only six weeks earlier.”There was a lot of stuff happening,” Tare tells ESPNcricinfo of the state of flux Mumbai were in. “There was no camp, then the results in the Mushtaq Ali Trophy. Senior players had an axe on them, they were called a lot of things. It was like we were humiliated. A lot of remarks were passed, questions raised about the future of certain individuals. It was tough.”On his very first day on the job, Powar knew cricket was far off, and there was a crisis to be resolved first. “Total chaos, crisis, and I like such a situation,” Powar says of his first thoughts as he linked up with the team. “In a way, when things are so bad, the only way is up. Everyone’s character shines through in a crisis. It’s easier to take over a team in chaos because everyone has that fire of wanting to fight back and answer the critics, even if they may not admit to it openly. I could see that with this group too.”Related

Covid-19 fears force BCCI to suspend men's Under-19 tournament

Shaw reveals he 'broke down' after being dropped in Australia

Shaw, Tare take Mumbai to fourth VHT title

Padikkal, Shaw create new benchmarks

A tough talker, Powar gave no illusions to the team in his first chat with them at the Wankhede Stadium before departure. “They were low, disappointed with themselves that they’d let the Mumbai brand of cricket down. It was difficult to pick them up initially,” Powar says.Tare remembers having a sense of focus as they regrouped. “Ramsy (Powar) openly declared confidence into players. He said: ‘once I back a player, I will back long-term.’ That told the players he’s not someone who will throw you out after two games. That feeling affects the mentality of a player and the squad. He addressed that in the first meeting itself, after which he did a lot of one-on-one work during our quarantine since we couldn’t go out to train.”Once the talking was done, it was time to make the most of their two training sessions before the tournament. The focused vibe appeared to trickle down to the entire group. It began with the side being punctual for the nets, meetings and team events. Training sessions intense and structured.”We told them, we will give them whatever they needed, infrastructure-wise and support-wise, but [we] expect the best, in terms of attitude and performance,” Powar says. “They understood it wasn’t just fun and games anymore.”Not initially in Mumbai’s longlist of players, Aditya Tare went on to score a match-winning hundred in the final•Aditya TareIyer, Suryakumar, Tare, Thakur play mentorsThe one-on-ones were about setting expectations, prioritizing the first XI, clarifying every player’s role and asking the senior group of five players – Tare, Shreyas Iyer, Suryakumar Yadav, Dhawal Kulkarni and Shardul Thakur – to play a mentorship role. They warmed up to it so seriously that even on the day of the final, hours before Iyer, Suryakumar and Shardul took the field for India in a T20I, they sent motivating messages to the entire team.”We told each of them where they stand and if they fit into our scheme of things presently, [and] if not, what we’ve got planned for them,” Powar says of the planning. “Some players were insecure, so you had to give them that confidence. Like for Tare, I told him you will play the entire tournament. I wanted Dhawal to be the bowling leader. The message for the batsmen was, you have freedom but there is responsibility too.”If you hit fifty, I don’t want you to be satisfied with it. Also, youngsters came with a fearless attitude. Mohit Avasthi, for example, wasn’t in the first 15 but we gave him a chance because we saw a good attitude in the nets and rewarded him for it. That motivated a lot of guys.”Powar’s brand of cricket is one of aggression. “On a seaming track, 10 overs, none for 30 is not useful,” he says. “You may as well go for 50 runs and get us three wickets. On turning tracks, you can’t get away bowling under-cutters, you need to go for wickets. I made it clear that winning doesn’t matter, the brand of cricket matters, and you must be a match-winner, you must make a difference. Even when we won, we were critical in our assessment of the players in private. Everything was straightforward. It changed the entire outlook of the team.”‘Show players what they can be, not what they are’In a way, Powar’s challenge was multifold because he was appointed for just one tournament in a pandemic year. With all of two sessions to find a winning blueprint, it could have been intimidating. Would Powar’s methods have been different if he’d been given a three-year vision instead?”One month or three years, my approach would’ve been the same,” he says. “I have learnt a lot of things under Rahul Dravid during my stint at the NCA as one of the assistant coaches. One of the things is, you don’t show a player what he is, but show him what he can be. It’s not about timeframe but how you manage people, right from the support staff to curators to administrators to junior players.”Outside of the cricket, I learnt plenty on the human behavioural aspect. See, you can have an easy way out and say ‘I can’t do anything in one month’ or just say, ‘give me 10 days and I’ll do this.’ For me, Mumbai’s reputation was at stake and our brand of cricket was going down, that is why I jumped in. I thought there was a possibility of me being able can turn this around. So yes, three years or one month, no worries. This change in mindset has changed my thought process of head coach.”The human behavioural aspect that Powar refers to is quite revealing. Player management, he admits, has become an important part of his coaching blueprint. In 2019, his short tenure as head coach of India Women ended after he was embroiled in a controversy over not picking Mithali Raj, the women’s ODI captain, for the T20 World Cup semi-final in the Caribbean. Raj had accused Powar of trying to “destroy” her career, and Powar responded by saying Raj had threatened to retire if she was not allowed to open.Powar reflects on that episode and believes the experience has made him handle situations better. “There’s no right or wrong,” he says. “My heart was clear, and I’ve learnt many ways to handle situations. One of the things is you don’t have to be proactive all the time, you can be subtle at times. There are different ways to convey certain things, it’s a learning process.”With time and knowledge, you gain from experienced people around you, you think ‘I may have done this little differently,’ but now I know, I have to have 20 methods to handle players, you can’t have just one method or two methods. That’s what I’ve learnt.”Shaw smashed 827 runs, the most in a single edition of the Vijay Hazare Trophy•PTI Project Prithvi ShawSo how did Powar handle Prithvi Shaw? Dropped after one poor Test in Australia, Shaw admitted to having felt some loneliness on tour, even as the rest of the world dissected his batting technique. Back to the Mumbai set-up as captain after Iyer left midway through the tournament on national duty, Shaw turned a corner and responded by smashing 827 runs, the most in a single edition of the Vijay Hazare Trophy. He became the first player in List A history to make three 150-plus scores in a single series or tournament when he made 227*, 185* and 165 in his first three matches as captain.”In Jaipur, we [support staff] and Shaw had a one-to-one. I asked him what he wants from us,” Powar says. “We told him what’s expected of him. I said ‘look, you’re a senior player in this squad, I want you to inspire young players’ and in the end, I asked him what he wanted us to give him. He just wanted to keep the dressing room light and have good vibes. You could sense how he wanted to be around people, mingle with them. Maybe the loneliness did get to him, so having people around him who resonate with his ideas, really was a big plus.”The way we structured practice you could see the change from the first session. He was happy with the atmosphere around, he batted for 15-20 minutes and then bowled at young batsmen like Yashasvi Jaiswal. Yes, technique-wise he was agitated, even disturbed. He said, ‘my hands are going away [from my body], I have to get it closer, it won’t come easy, but I will keep working on it in the room, trying to shadow practice my downswing.’ But as much as it was about the technique, it was also about getting his mind right and getting him to understand why he needed to do certain things. Once that was sorted, he was clear.”Before the final when we trained, he didn’t bat at all. He bowled two hours to everyone with the sidearm. He likes to create an atmosphere where everyone is relaxed, everyone gets something out. He went through patches where he was alone, so he wanted to be there for everyone. I didn’t know about him sobbing [after getting dropped in Australia] initially even though I got the feeling, talking to him later. You could see he didn’t want to be alone, he wanted to mix with everyone. He was throwing at the batters not playing, not even in contention. Even the guys in the last seven.”‘It’s okay if I don’t bat, give Jaiswal enough practice’ – SarfarazOne of the things Powar wanted to inculcate was to get players talking more, and taking the onus on themselves. Team meetings, he says, were driven by the senior players to begin with. Youngsters would often be asked for their ideas, given situations, and asked how they’d approach it. One of the particularly engaging group sessions involved a debate with the team splitting themselves into Team Lionel Messi v Team Cristiano Ronaldo, depending on who they liked.Aditya Tare is chaired off the field by his team-mates after scoring a match-winning century in the final•Aditya Tare”That was fun,” Powar says. “You could see them become lively and intense; it was as if you had unlocked something. They were fiercely debating, backed it with data, trophies they’ve won, what they did in which championship. It mirrored the on-field intensity. They were close, and even if everyone can’t be friends all the time, you could say it got them closer.”Powar uses Jaiswal’s example to underline this. “Yashasvi is a kind of player who plays thousands of balls at the nets, but because of quarantine restrictions and severe time crunch, he couldn’t have the same level of build-up,” Powar says. “You could see he was struggling for timing, struggling for runs. Before the quarter-final against Saurashtra, Sarfaraz Khan knocked on my room and said: ‘Sir, I think Yashasvi is struggling, I think you should give him more batting. Even if it means my batting time is slightly reduced.'”Now, I was surprised at his maturity of knowing what’s best for the team at a given moment, even though Sarfaraz himself hadn’t got too many opportunities to bat. It was particularly refreshing because Jaiswal and Sarfaraz are completely different individuals. Because of that, they’re not the best of friends. But for the team’s sake, here, they were ready to do anything. The was heartening. The next day he scored a 75, but yes, it told us he’s someone who needs a lot of training. Maybe once the bubble is over, he will be a different player, type of guy who needs to bat more and more.” is a thing of the past While they’ve got their first trophy in the bag, for Powar, winning wasn’t the only thing. It has started as a journey in trying to transform the “brand of cricket” – something he alludes to often – he wants to see Mumbai play. For starters, he wants to see the term (a word that roughly means “stubborn”, in the sense of batsmen putting a price on their wicket) being shelved, for he believes it isn’t reflective of how the current generation of players approach the game. It’s a common refrain to hear past players talk of how no season is successful until Mumbai have won it. Powar thinks it’s time to redefine what a successful season is.”A lot of people still say show attitude. That’s fine, it’s in the past and we lived up to it,” Powar explains. “But it’s about time the current generation is motivated differently. Can’t keep bringing that up again and again.”We all know Mumbai’s legacy has been built in red-ball cricket. Right now, there’s a lot of white-ball cricket happening. This current group has 12 players featuring in the IPL. Going forward, the white-ball legacy can’t be understated either. You can’t be and dominate in white-ball cricket.”

Lancashire, Yorkshire go head-to-head in pursuit of glory

We assess the chances of the teams in Group Three in our County Championship preview

ESPNcricinfo staff06-Apr-2021

Glamorgan

Timm van der Gugten gets a congratulatory elbow•Getty ImagesLast season: 6th in Central Group
Director of cricket: Mark Wallace
Coach: Matt Maynard
Captain: Chris Cooke
Overseas players: Andy Balbirnie, Marnus Labuschagne, Michael Neser
Ins: James Weighell (Durham)
Outs: Marchant de Lange (Somerset), Craig Meschede (retired), Connor Brown, Kieran Bull, Charlie Hemphrey, Owen Morgan, Graham Wagg (all released)
After narrowly missing out on promotion in 2019, Glamorgan struggled in the Bob Willis Trophy, finishing bottom of the pile without a win. Their chances of success this season will rely heavily on their two Queensland imports, Marnus Labuschagne and Michael Neser, who will arrive three or four games into the season following the conclusion of the Sheffield Shield: Labuschagne’s 1114-run season in 2019 was the start of his rise to stardom, while the bustling Neser should be a perfect fit for early season conditions.
Andy Balbirnie will fill in for Labuschagne in the early rounds and looked in good touch against Somerset in pre-season, but Billy Root, captain Chris Cooke and the fit-again David Lloyd will have to do heavy lifting with the bat if they are to compete. Marchant de Lange’s departure to Somerset is a significant blow, while Graham Wagg has also left the club: Timm van der Gugten and Michael Hogan remain potent forces, but Lukas Carey and Dan Douthwaite will have important roles with the ball. The promising left-arm spinner Prem Sisodiya should have a chance to impress at some stage.
One to watch: Callum Taylor, 22, is the son of a former Pontypool rugby union player – who gave him the middle name “Zinzan” – and made quite an impression in the BWT. In his first-ever first-class innings, he was on 27 off 46 balls when Glamorgan slipped to 135 for 9 against Northants, and proceeded to hammer 79 from his next 48 in a rollicking stand. He bowls serviceable offspin on top of his punchy middle-order batting, and should play a major role. Matt Roller
Bet365: 66-1

Kent

Jack Leaning and Jordan Cox pose in front of the scoreboard after their record stand in 2020•Getty ImagesLast season: 2nd in South Group
Director of cricket: Paul Downton
Coach: Matt Walker
Captain: Sam Billings
Overseas players: Miguel Cummins (April-June), Heino Kuhn
Ins: Nathan Gilchrist (Somerset), Tawanda Muyeye
Outs: Sean Dickson (Durham), Calum Hagget, Ivan Thomas (both released), Adam Rouse (retired)
There’s a feeling among the Kent hierarchy that they have built good depth in their squad and now is the time to start seeing the knock-on effects of competition from within for places. “It’s exciting,” says Matt Walker. “Of course it’s what happens over the next six months that will really tell the whole story. It’s very important that we have that challenge amongst the group. In my experienced that always produces the best cricket.”
The additions of Harry Podmore and Matt Milnes in 2018 and 2019 respectively have bolstered the club’s seam stocks alongside an evergreen and ever-reliable Darren Stevens, who is about to turn 45. But it is the recruitment of West Indies fast bowler Miguel Cummins that could prove a masterstroke and Kent will be keen to make best use of the man who took a five-for against them for Middlesex in the Bob Willis Trophy last year for the first eight Championship games they have him for.
Zak Crawley and Sam Billings will surely miss chunks of the season on England and IPL duty. Their absence should, in theory, be covered by the likes of new vice-captain Daniel Bell Drummond, who enjoyed a strong pre-season and will be captain when Billings is at the IPL, and Joe Denly, whose time with England last summer proved fruitless. Jack Leaning, who joined from Yorkshire last year, and youngster Jordan Cox have also proven themselves more than handy with the bat.
One to watch: Jordan Cox’s 238 not out in an unbroken stand worth 423 with Leaning handed Kent an innings victory over Sussex last August and announced the then 19-year-old Cox as an exciting prospect. If he can kick on this season, it can only mean good things for Kent’s quest for silverware. Valkerie Baynes
Bet365: 10-1

Lancashire

George Balderson was one of a number of young players to come through at Lancashire in 2020•Getty ImagesRelated

  • Bell-Drummond has much left to achieve after decade at Kent

  • Parnell to miss Northants opener after quarantine extended

  • Head, Handscomb turn thoughts to England

Last season (BWT): 3rd in South Group
Director of cricket: Paul Allott
Coach: Glen Chapple
Captain: Dane Vilas
Overseas: Dane Vilas, Jackson Bird
Ins: Luke Wells (Sussex), Jack Blatherwick (Nottinghamshire)
Outs: Brooke Guest (Derbyshire), Toby Lester, Stephen Parry (both released), Graham Onions (retired)
A decade has passed since Lancashire enjoyed Championship catharsis under the captain-coach combination of Glen Chapple and Peter Moores. Since that much-feted title, the club has arguably been better run off the field than on it: three times they have had to bounce back from Division One relegation – most recently, in 2019, when Dane Vilas led the team through an unbeaten promotion campaign in his first season in charge.
Chapple is now head coach, and in 2020 the BWT was all about blooding local talent. Teenage allrounder George Balderson played all five games, while five other players between 19 and 22 made promising debuts; Josh Bohannon and Danny Lamb, in the side for a few years, continued to make strides. And although Jos Buttler and Liam Livingstone will miss the first chunk of the season at the IPL, there is core group of established pedigree at Old Trafford – including Vilas, sometime England opener Keaton Jennings, wicketkeeper Alex Davies, former captain Steven Croft, workhorse seamer Tom Bailey and Australia international Jackson Bird (from round three) – to propel a strong Championship challenge. Not to mention Matt Parkinson and Saqib Mahmood, young men champing at the bit after winters spent mulling non-selection by England.
James Anderson is set to miss the opening two rounds as England manage his workload and his availability could make the difference when it comes to pushing for top two – Anderson took 30 wickets at 9.36 in 2019, setting the club up for runaway success. Group Three contains four teams who competed in Division Two two years ago, and Lancashire play six of their first eight games against such opposition.
One to watch: After the departure of the long-serving Stephen Parry, Lancashire have not one but two greenhorn slow left-arm spinners coming through to replace him in Tom Hartley and Jack Morley. Hartley, 22, is the senior man, tall and slender and a feature of both the BWT and Blast sides last year; the pair memorably bowled Lancashire to victory on the final day against Derbyshire at Aigburth.Alan Gardner
Bet365: 9-1

Northamptonshire

Charlie Thurston was the find of the season for Northants last summer•Getty ImagesLast season (BWT): 4th in Central Group
Coach: David Ripley
Captain: Adam Rossington
Overseas: Wayne Parnell
Ins: Tom Taylor (Leicestershire)
Outs: Brett Hutton (Nottinghamshire), Rob Newton, Blessing Muzarabani, Tom Sole (all released)
Whether Northants, likes Gloucestershire, will ever get to enjoy the fruits of their promotion to Division One in 2019, after long years stuck in the second tier, remains up for debate. But in what looks a relatively open group, they will once again be aiming to perform above expectations. The departure of Brett Hutton, who re-joined Nottinghamshire after three impressive seasons at Wantage Road, could weaken the attack at Adam Rossington’s disposal, but Ben Sanderson remains a formidable force with the red ball in hand and Wayne Parnell may prove a shrewd overseas recruit – albeit he will miss the start of the season while in quarantine.
The Bob Willis Trophy allowed the introduction of some younger faces, with Charlie Thurston taking his chance to finish as Northants’ leading run-scorer – 357 at 44.62 – and 20-year-old Emilio Gay emerging as a promising top-order option. Ben Curran and Ricardo Vasconcelos look set to start as the opening pair, with Alex Wakely, in his first full campaign since stepping down as captain during 2019, the senior man in a young batting line-up. Tom Taylor, an allrounder with England Lions potential, looks a good signing from Leicestershire, and Gareth Berg is still going strong at 40. The BWT also saw Simon Kerrigan make his comeback after a three-year career hiatus, and the one-cap England spinner could be another feel-good Northants story in the offing.
One to watch: Jack White, a 29-year-old seamer from Cumbria, made his first-class debut last summer and claimed an impressive 13 wickets at 20.00 from four games. Plucked from the club scene in the North West, he is looking to follow in the footsteps of Sanderson and Richard Gleeson as late-blooming talents who proved their worth at first-class level with Northamptonshire. AG
Bet365: 33-1

Sussex

James Kirtley and Ian Salisbury will split head-coaching responsibilities at Sussex•Sussex County Cricket ClubLast season: 6th in South Group
Director of cricket: Keith Greenfield
Coach: Ian Salisbury
Captain: Ben Brown
Overseas players: Travis Head (Australia – end of April onwards), Stiaan van Zyl (South Africa – full season)
Ins:
Outs: Laurie Evans (Surrey), Danny Briggs (Warwickshire), Luke Wells (Lancashire), Harry Finch, Will Sheffield (both released)
Under new management with Ian Salisbury taking over from Jason Gillespie in the first-class and one-day formats (James Kirtley will be T20 coach), Sussex will be looking to overcome a disappointing couple of years, having narrowly missed out on promotion in 2018 then dropping to sixth in Division two in 2019.
There is a sense that the club is still building towards bigger things, highlighted by the hook for their membership drive: “A New Beginning”. A maiden first-class five-for to left-arm seamer George Garton against Essex last year showed off his promise and he has enjoyed a good pre-season with 3 for 35 and an unbeaten 33 in a friendly against Surrey. Jack Carson, the 20-year-old Irish offspinner and teenage paceman Henry Crocombe were also among the wickets in that drawn match.
Both pre-season friendlies – Sussex also drew at Hampshire – had to be moved after a bug infestation damaged the outfield at Hove. As a result, their opening fixture against Lancashire has also been switched, to Old Trafford. Experienced captain Ben Brown scored heavily in pre-season, as did 22-year-old Tom Haines, who notched a century at Surrey and 72 against Hampshire.
One to watch: With a Test squad place beckoning, Ollie Robinson is focused on taking that next step. With proven wicket-taking ability, amassing 137 wickets across 2018 and 2019 plus another 14 at 12.50 in the Bob Willis Trophy, he’ll also benefit from having spent months training with England’s squads over the past year. VB
Bet365: 12-1

Yorkshire

Yorkshire’s Jordan Thompson in his delivery stride•Getty ImagesLast season: 1st, North Group
Director of Cricket: Martyn Moxon
Coach:Andrew Gale
Captain:Steve Patterson
Overseas players:Duanne Olivier, Mathew Pillans
Ins:Dom Bess (Somerset)
Outs: Ed Barnes (Leicestershire), Jared Warner (Gloucestershire), James Logan (released)
Yorkshire topped their group last season, only to be the group winner that missed out to Essex and Somerset for a place in the final. Their chief executive Mark Arthur consoled members at the Zoom annual general meeting by pronouncing that Yorkshire’s squad was the strongest he had known in nearly a decade in the job.
That is tantamount to predicting a Championship win and to get that they initially have to finish in the top two of the opening group without Dawid Malan, who will miss eight matches because of an IPL deal. Joe Root’s presence in the early games will be cheering, but of longer-term significance will be whether Gary Ballance can score heavily after missing 2020 with a stress-related illness. If not, expectations will fall to a large degree on Harry Brook.
The two overseas players are post-Brexit oddities: Duanne Olivier, a one-time Kolpak, carries hostility, but Mathew Pillans’ presence as an overseas player now his ancestral visa is disqualified is a mere convenience. Dom Bess brings spin-bowling quality assuming he puts his India ups and downs behind him and he will aim to get the weight of runs once provided by Tim Bresnan. If three bowling allrounders – Jordan Thompson, Matthew Waite and Matthew Fisher – kick on then spearheads Ben Coad and David Willey should not be short of support.
One to watch: Jordan Thompson, a seam bowling allrounder, made a strong impression in the BWT, averaging 47 with the bat and 16 with the ball, and now has to try to carry such impressive figures forward as the Championship heads back towards normality. David Hopps
Bet365: 7-1

Mohammed Siraj, five Tests old with the nous of a veteran

There’s nothing raw or naive about the India quick, even though he’s barely two months old in Test cricket

Karthik Krishnaswamy04-Mar-20211:15

The aim was to bowl consistently in the same spot – Siraj

You probably remember the Cameron Green dismissal. Outswinger, outswinger, outswinger, and then the coup de grâce.

It isn’t often that a fast bowler does that on debut, but there was little rawness or naivete about Mohammed Siraj when he came to Test cricket.On Thursday in Ahmedabad, Siraj demonstrated that this dismissal was by no means a one-off, and this time chose as his victim one of the world’s best batsmen.You can watch it here. As with the Green video, this one leaves out a couple of in-between balls that don’t quite fit the out-out-in narrative, but the essence is there.And the essence is of control and a disconcerting slipperiness, a feeling that the batsman is being hurried into his decision-making. It can’t be easy to do that to Joe Root, but Siraj does it. He does it with his pace, the lateness of his movement, and his bustling energy through the crease, which probably makes him a little harder to pick up than bowlers with a more measured load-up and release.The balls that leave Root, which he fences at uncomfortably, swing late rather than seam off the pitch. The length is shorter than a typical swing bowler’s length, and this probably disconcerts the batsman too. Then there’s a ball of similar length that nips back in, off the surface, and smacks Root on the thigh pad as he attempts, awkwardly, to shuffle out of the way.4:20

Bell: Siraj could be effective with the Dukes ball in English conditions

The ball that gets Root, much like the ball that got Green, doesn’t just do the batsman for movement but also for length. It’s fuller than all the previous balls, though not quite as full as the one that got Green out.The ball that gets Root pitches on that most discomfiting length – the shortest one that’ll still hit the top of the stumps. That length scrambles batsmen’s footwork at the best of times, but here Root has also been pushed back by all the balls that came before. When the slightly fuller in-ducker arrives, therefore, his feet are stuck in the crease.During the Australia tour, Sachin Tendulkar got interested in Siraj’s in-ducker. He put out a video explaining how Siraj bowled it, with a last-minute tilt of his wrist at delivery, and with the seam wobbling as the ball approached the batsmen.

Siraj bowled quite a few of these balls on Thursday, judging by slow-motion replays, and may well have got Root out with it too. He didn’t go into too much detail about his grip or release during his press conference at the end of the day’s play, but he described what his plan had been.”I thought I’d set him up by bowling a few balls going away, and then one ball coming in,” Siraj said. “I was feeling happy that I was getting it to go away, and then when I was about to bowl the first ball of a fresh over, I thought I’d bowl one that goes in, and pitch it up. It came out just as I had hoped it would. I was delighted when I bowled that ball.”It takes immense skill and control to pull this off, but, as mentioned earlier, there’s little rawness or naivete about Siraj’s bowling.He remains endearingly bashful at press conferences, however, and it can be hard to get a lot out of him.Mohammed Siraj has shown versatility and potency in his international career so far•BCCIWhat did all his first-class experience – especially his 16 India A games, six in India and the rest spread across tours of South Africa, England, New Zealand and the West Indies – teach him before he came to Test cricket?”When we played Ranji Trophy and India A matches, our only plan was to bowl with patience in one area, that’s it, keep bowling there and the wickets will come.”What were his plans today?”Virat [kohli] told me, you have one job, just keep bowling in one area, and keep building pressure. I spoke to Ishant as well, and he also said just keep bowling in one area, it’s better if you don’t try too many things, because if you build pressure, the wickets will come, so that was our plan.”Then the inevitable question about what he learned from Rahul Dravid when he played for India A.”When I was performing in the Ranji Trophy and when Rahul sir saw me, when I was selected for India A in South Africa, he used to tell me, the line and length you bowl is very good, just focus on that and on your fitness. Whenever I played for India A, Rahul sir supported me a lot. He didn’t tell me too many things, just to focus on my line and length, and that it would bring me success.”You get the idea.You don’t get wickets in Test cricket simply by bowling in one area, of course. You also need pace and movement and the ability to know what lines and lengths can trouble which batsmen. Siraj has all of that, as he showed once again with his wicket of Jonny Bairstow in the fourth over after lunch.”I hadn’t bowled much to Bairstow,” Siraj said. “He hadn’t faced a single ball from me [in that spell], but whatever videos I had watched of him and his dismissals, he was getting out a lot to the inswinger. So my plan was to bring one in from the fourth-stump line, and I was successful.”Again, he told himself to bowl a particular delivery on a particular spot, and did exactly that. He did it at 146.4kph. He hit the same awkward length that had trapped Root, but beat Bairstow for pace too.By then, he had already engaged in a fiery bout with Ben Stokes, troubling him with his angle across the left-hander – usually bringing the batsman forward and almost always ending up in that play-or-leave channel – throwing in the bouncer, and engaging in a little verbal duel too. At the end of the day’s play, both batsman and bowler brushed it off as one of those things that happen when two athletes are giving it their all.There was a short passage of play, soon after the Bairstow dismissal, when Siraj bowled to Ollie Pope and shifted to a noticeably fuller length. Perhaps it was just because a new batsman was in, or perhaps it had something to do with Pope’s tendency to squat into a firm forward press and drive away from his body. We won’t know, because that contest didn’t last too long, and ended up unresolved. But it said something about the range of things Siraj can do.That range is probably why it was perfectly natural for India to pick him over Umesh Yadav – a bowler with 63 wickets in Indian conditions, at an average of 19.34, since the start of 2017 – for this Test match. The fact that Umesh hadn’t played any competitive cricket since injuring his hamstring in December probably tilted the scales in Siraj’s favour, but it’s a fairly new thing for India’s team management to have this depth of fast-bowling talent to choose from.India lost the toss, bowled first, and bowled England out for 205 on a pitch that was by no means as spin-friendly as the ones that had hosted the previous two Tests. This pitch demanded that all their bowlers, fast and slow, pull their weight. The spinners ended up sharing eight wickets, but Siraj’s contribution was no less crucial: 14 impressive overs, the wicket of England’s best batsman, and the wicket that ended their biggest partnership.Not bad at all for a guy playing only his fifth Test match.

Javed Miandad on Sharjah 1986: 'To describe it is impossible. This was a gift from God'

Thirty-five years on, a look back at the last-ball six that marked a high point in Pakistan’s cricket history

Osman Samiuddin18-Apr-2021The mid-pitch conference at Sharjah lasted at least twenty seconds. Javed Miandad, one hand on hip, one on bat, lush moustache dominating face, now remembers remarkably little of it. ‘It was one of those nothing ones, where you just hang around, catch a breath,’ he says. The conference the ball before had been, he believes, the crucial one. ‘That was when I had told him that we have to take a single, no matter what.”Him’ remembers it differently, as perhaps he would. Tauseef Ahmed–no off-spinner so resembled Lionel Ritchie–wasn’t even supposed to be there. The wicketkeeper Zulqernain had been sent above Tauseef, after Ramiz Raja told captain Imran Khan that he hit big sixes in club games in Lahore. He could, but he didn’t–despite Tauseef telling him to go for a single to get Miandad on strike just before he went out–and when he was bowled attempting one of those sixes, two balls were left, five runs needed.Tauseef’s memory is sharper, and in it, he inverts what Miandad wrote in his autobiography. Perhaps his children believe him. ‘I told Javed when I came out that we simply had to take a run no matter what, even if the ball went to the wicketkeeper. Javed asked me whether I was sure, and I said we don’t have a chance otherwise.’ So Tauseef bunted towards cover and ran. Mohammad Azharuddin, one of the world’s best fielders, ran in, picked up and missed the stumps from no more than four feet.Related

Six and done – Javed saves the best for last

Miandad seals it with a six

Then came the mid-pitch conference. ‘He came to me and asked me, “What do you think he’ll try to do?”’ continues Tauseef. ‘I said he’ll definitely go for a yorker. Javed said, “Yes, and that means it could also become a full toss if he doesn’t get it right.” In any case, Javed was standing out of his crease a little.’Chetan Sharma bowled perhaps the world’s best-known yorker gone wrong•Adrian Murrell/Getty ImagesNineteen years later, on a train ride from Visakhapatnam to Jamshedpur, a group of Indian and Pakistani journalists sat in a berth with Chetan Sharma, once cricketer of India and planner of that yorker, then reporter for Zee TV. The journey was twenty-seven hours in the middle of a hectic tour, so talk naturally could be of one thing alone. A few beers down, surreptitiously consumed as if he was doing so in a dorm at boarding school, Sharma was the entertainment. Story after story came out, achievements and disappointments, selectorial slights, a*****e teammates, of what is wrong with everything in Indian cricket, the media, the world. Journalists being journalists, especially Pakistani ones, and fond of dealing in misery, there was only one story everyone wanted to hear. It wasn’t about Sharma’s unexpected ODI century as a pinch-hitter against England. It wasn’t even about a World Cup hat-trick. After a cigarette break, it was decided that the question would finally be asked; having held out for five hours, the great, stinking big elephant in the room would have to be poked. Two hours in, an outsider walking by recognizing Sharma, had stepped in excitedly wanting to chat; the journalists felt could’ve been the moment but he merely asked about Sharma’s hat-trick and left.Finally, the man from Reuters asked: ‘Chetan bhai, tell us one thing… what were you…’ Sharma interrupted. He knew this question. He had probably answered it to himself a million times over. ‘Arrey yaar, I just wanted to bowl a yorker.’He wanted to, but he didn’t. After the mid-pitch chat, Miandad stood at his wicket looking around the field. He needed four somewhere. He counted fielders around the ground–perhaps hoping it had swallowed a few–and took guard. Had Miandad successfully petitioned God for the ideal delivery, he could not have conjured up a better one; a thigh-high full toss, swinging in to his legs. He put it somewhere in the region of the stands at midwicket, arms raised almost in one motion from finishing the shot, and off he ran. Iftikhar Ahmed, the TV commentator, waited three seconds before concluding: ‘It’s a six … and Pakistan have won … unnnnbelievable win by Pakistan …’ He was calmer than many could hope to be and certainly more than the strangled screech heard just before his voice, a more manic subcontinent predecessor to Budweiser’s ingratiating ‘Waazzzup’; that it came from the short, round Mushtaq Mohammad, only nominally an impartial expert in the commentary box, is unsurprising.Like cartoons running away from a building on fire, Miandad and Tauseef hurtled to the pavilion from where a sizeable crowd was already pouring out. Smartly, Miandad–just behind Tauseef–curved away off-screen, while Tauseef went straight into the fans. He was greeted by fast bowling teammate Zakir Khan just before a , local police, seemed to knock him down with his baton, trying to control the crowd. ‘No, no, he didn’t hit me,’ Tauseef busted one enduring comic myth, ‘he just bumped into me and knocked me over.’Going downtown again: Miandad smacks one in a Benson and Hedges Cup game in Perth in 1987•Associated PressThat one shot was like a mince grinder in reverse. Into that burst went every strand of the transformation Pakistan had undergone over the preceding decade and half; the emergence of a superstar core, the spread of the game, the growing power of the player, the administrative vision of Abdul Hafeez Kardar and Nur Khan, the birth of departmental cricket, the rise of TV, more money. On the other side came out one solid lump of a golden age, the most golden age, in fact, Pakistan has ever had.Until came the logical conclusion in 1992 of the World Cup triumph, Pakistan were arguably the best side in the world alongside the West Indies. They lost just one Test series till 1993 (and only three in the decade between 1985 and 1995) and won a host of ODI tournaments, not least in Sharjah itself. Until 1999, by which time they had fallen–but still only lost six series from thirty-six–they remained one of the top sides in the world.To Miandad, describing the innings is dependent on his mood and bearing. Sometimes it is a simple gift from God. ‘Let’s take it from the start,’ he begins, and he really does. ‘I believe in Quran and its verses. I read it right? So I used to always pray to God that in my own field, help me do this one big feat that will always be remembered. This was my prayer.’I saw there were bigger players before me, who weren’t remembered. So I always prayed that I do something big. I used to tell myself, even if I die in the field, I don’t care. It’s like a soldier dying on duty. It is (martyrdom). That innings was like a gift to me. I didn’t play cricket like that, ever. That match … it was like a film. When I dream, it was like a film whose story has been written and now the film is being made. You cannot imagine one of the best fielders, from a few yards away missing three stumps, that you went in such crisis, wickets are falling, you are saved from a run-out, one four is stopped in last over, last ball finish, where the match was and where it went. This is a gift. To describe it is impossible. This was a gift from God.’Sometimes he takes recourse in rationality. ‘When I started, we’d already lost a few wickets, so the plan was to bat till the end so that even if we lost, we did with some dignity. Gradually, I started taking chances. Mostly I took risks with the running, but I’d hit a boundary and then stop for a few overs, before trying it again. We got to the last 20 overs still needing 9 or 10 per over. That was when I started actively working it out in my head, what we needed every over, where to get it, who to work with. By the time the last ball was to be bowled, I had become a computer: I knew exactly what Chetan was going to do, so I stood well out of my crease. He tried a yorker but being that far out, it became a high-ish full toss and I just swung. As soon as I connected, I knew it was gone.’

Brendan Taylor: Zimbabwe's second highest run-getter in ODIs

All the stats and records from the former captain’s 17-year career for Zimbabwe.

Sampath Bandarupalli13-Sep-20216684 Runs scored by Brendan Taylor in ODI cricket, the second-most for Zimbabwe in this format, behind Andy Flower’s 6786 runs. Taylor needed 110 runs on Monday to end his career as Zimbabwe’s leading run-getter in ODIs, but scored only seven.11 Taylor holds the record for scoring the most number of centuries for Zimbabwe in ODI cricket, with 11 to his name. He also has 39 fifties in this format, which takes his tally of fifty-plus scores to 50, behind only Andy Flower’s 59.6 Test hundreds for Taylor, the joint second-most by a player for Zimbabwe. Andy Flower leads the list with 12 centuries, while his brother, Grant Flower, also has six Test tons. Taylor’s tally of 2320 Test runs is the fourth most for his country in this format.2 Instances of Taylor scoring centuries in both innings of a Test match – against Bangladesh in 2013 and 2018. Only twice has anyone else scored twin tons in a Test for Zimbabwe – Grant Flower against New Zealand in 1997 and Andy Flower against South Africa in 2001. Taylor’s effort in 2013 came while leading the team, the only instance of a Zimbabwe captain scoring hundreds in both innings of a Test match.ESPNcricinfo Ltd9938 Taylor ended his career 62 runs short of 10,000 runs in international cricket. Only two players have scored more international runs for Zimbabwe, the Flower brothers – Andy (11580) and Grant (10028).2 Taylor scored two centuries in the World Cups, both in his last two innings of the 2015 edition – 121 against Ireland and 138 against India. He is the only Zimbabwean with multiple hundreds in the World Cup. Taylor has scored 690 runs in World Cups, the second-most for Zimbabwe behind Andy Flower’s 815. He scored 433 runs in 2015, the most for Zimbabwe in a single edition of the World Cup.5 out of nine centuries in ODIs by Zimbabwe captains were scored by Taylor. The remaining four were accounted for by Alistair Campbell and Elton Chigumbura – two each while leading Zimbabwe. Taylor’s four hundreds as a Test captain are also the most by anyone for Zimbabwe.17 Hundreds in International cricket for Taylor, the most by a batter for Zimbabwe. It includes nine scored as captain, six more than any other skipper for Zimbabwe.106 Sixes hit by Taylor in ODI cricket, the most by any player for Zimbabwe. He went past Chigumbura’s 105 sixes during the first ODI of the ongoing series against Ireland.

David Warner rides his luck on way to 94

England left to ponder missed chances, no-balls and selection

Andrew McGlashan09-Dec-2021Midway through the opening session of the second day, TV cameras panned to the Gabba nets. Running in were 1,156 Test wickets with James Anderson and Stuart Broad relieved from drinks duty to prepare themselves, you would presume, to be unleashed with the pink ball in Adelaide.In the middle of the ground there was an absorbing contest between David Warner and the pace bowlers England had selected for this opening Test. Warner had already had a life in what would be a charmed innings when he was bowled on 17 by a Ben Stokes no-ball.Warner’s final score, 94, was one run fewer than he managed through the entire 2019 Ashes when Broad was his nemesis. Whether Broad would have got him earlier in this innings no one knows – although surely Warner was happy to not see him at the top of his mark – but England’s incumbent quicks certainly created enough opportunities to claim the wicket.This time, however, it was Warner’s day even though he would fall short of a 25th Test hundred.In the 2019 Ashes, ESPNcricinfo’s data recorded that Warner played 64 false shots among his 10 dismissals – so on average 6.4 per dismissal – whereas on the second day in Brisbane in played 30 false shots, the last of which was spooning a catch to mid-off. On one hand that is a reminder of how extraordinary the previous series was, and the brilliance of Broad, and on other the fine lines that batters tread between success and failure. “Sometimes you just nick everything,” is a phrase you often hear from a batter.Warner had not played first-class since last March and in his two Test matches against India last season he was virtually batting on one leg having been rushed back with a groin injury to patch up the top order. So this was his first Test innings without a physical hindrance since he flayed New Zealand and Pakistan during the 2019-2020 season.David Warner acknowledges the ovation for his half-century•CA/Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesHe was troubled by Mark Wood’s pace and Ollie Robinson’s nibble but played and missed rather than nicking it. Sometimes Wood was just too quick and Warner did not always seem in control of his movements. Stokes found Warner’s edge with his second ball but it evaded the cordon, although as later replays would confirm it was also a no-ball as part of a large picture of missed overstepping highlighted by the absence of no-ball technology.Another edge against Robinson went along the ground and Chris Woakes produced a lifting delivery which was unplayable. Warner had scrapped to 32 off 76 balls during the first session when he twice deposited Jack Leach for six in what was a clear statement of how Australia plan to approach England’s spinners in this series – Marnus Labuschagne and Travis Head would do considerable damage on a chastening day for Leach.When Warner’s edge was found and it carried against Robinson, on 48, shortly after lunch the catch burst through the hands of Rory Burns at second slip to continue a forgettable two days.Further evidence that fortune was with Warner came on 60 when he clipped the ball to Haseeb Hameed at short leg and instinctively set off for a run before realising Hameed had the ball. As he turned to get back into his crease he slipped, lost the bat and was left scrambling outside of the crease only for Hameed’s shy to missWarner went to tea six runs short of a century but did not progress any further when he lobbed a catch to mid-off during a period where England briefly brought themselves back into the contest through Wood and Robinson.On another day, like those he had two years ago in England, this could have been a very different story for Warner. He’ll just hope he hasn’t used up his fortune in his first innings.

Bangladesh taking steps to become 'a lot harder and tougher'

Though they are behind in the St George’s Park Test, the visitors are refusing to buckle under pressure

Firdose Moonda09-Apr-2022There’s that time in a St George’s Park Test when the score doesn’t matter. It’s usually after tea, when the band has started the endless rendition of “Stand by Me” that stays in spectators’ auditory memories for months, and the summer seems like it could last forever.In this Test, that time came in the 20 overs that Tamim Iqbal and Najmul Hossain Shanto entertained the mostly-Bangladesh-supporting crowd with a counter-attacking display against overpitched bowling from South African seamers. They drove with authority, swept with confidence and timed the ball as though it was choreographed to the ongoing soundtrack.It was an hour-and-a-half of pure cricketing bliss, which ended abruptly when Wiaan Mulder was given the ball in the 21st over. His fifth delivery angled in sharply and missed Tamim Iqbal’s attempted push and hit him on the pad as he fell over. Tamim was given out lbw, thought about reviewing and decided not to, to bring his 57-ball 47 to an end. In Mulder’s next over, he had Shanto in a similar fashion and three overs after that, also accounted for Mominul Haque, out lbw as he missed an inswinger.Mulder’s introduction looked a stroke of genius, though Vernon Philander had been calling it from the commentary box since the previous Test and with good reason. Though it is not especially warm, it grew more humid as the afternoon went on and the wind direction changed from coming off the land, to coming off the sea, enabling red-ball swing. Mulder is the one bowler in this attack who can these exploit conditions, and he has been under-utilised so far. He sent just four overs down in Durban, despite South Africa playing only two specialist seamers. Pre-match, Elgar said he would like to use Mulder more and in favourable circumstances, Mulder showed how useful he can be.That’s as much a reminder to Mulder himself as it is to his captain and the selectors, because his role in the team does not always appear that clear. In theory, he is a batting allrounder – and his distress at being dismissed for a duck in the first innings in Durban, when he sat in the dugout, alone, for about 20 minutes afterwards, indicates he takes that role seriously. But if South Africa are going to get the most out of him, especially in an attack with only four other bowlers, then he will have to be given more responsibility with the ball and he seems pretty okay with the idea. Mulder came to life during his six-over spell and even fielded with more energy than he had throughout the series, flinging himself around at slip and smiling every time he pulled off a good stop.But things were not always that jovial.Khaled Ahmed and Kyle Verryenne were involved in a fiery battle•AFP/Getty ImagesThe day started antagonistically when Bangladesh’s seamers showed some of the bite that must have been, at least in part, brought out by their new bowling coach Allan Donald. Khaled Ahmed thought he had Kyle Verreynne at the end of his first over, when he hit above the knee-roll, and Bangladesh reviewed. Replays showed it was a poor decision to send upstairs with the ball missing leg stump by a distance.Khaled was angry. So angry that three overs later, he hurled the ball back at Verreynne and hit him on the hand.”Throwing the ball back at the batter just happened and was a misdirected throw rather than something intended to hit the batter,” Jamie Siddons, Bangladesh’s bowling coach said. “That’s just normal fast bowlers getting frustrated after bowling 30 overs and not taking wickets.”Verreynne didn’t see it that way and got angry back. He held out his arms, shrugging in disdain, before advancing down the track to let Khaled know what he thought. Some of the other Bangladesh players had to get involved to separate them before the umpires intervened. On the sidelines, Elgar, who had told Bangladesh to harden up pre-match, seemed to find the whole thing rather amusing and made no effort to hide his giggles.From the Bangladesh changeroom, Donald made his way down to the side of the field, either to try and calm things down or to make a tactical recommendation. He was seen asking for a third slip to be put in, immediately after Mulder edged Ebadot Hossain wide of second slip in the previous over, and was visibly irritated that Bangladesh had not put one in place. They didn’t need it anyway because Khaled got his reward when he bowled Verreynne through the bat-pad gap and celebrated with a roar. Donald looked on approvingly. It’s likely he was as pleased about the wicket as he was with the aggression Khaled had shown all morning.Bangladesh have brought a talented group of quicks, who Maharaj described as “fast bowlers who are not slow,” and are willing to intimidate on this tour. For the second time in the series, there was a mid-pitch altercation after Ebaddot threw the ball back to Elgar in Durban. It was after that match that the conversation about the spirit of this series began. Bangladesh claimed South Africa were overstepping, South Africa denied it and went a step further, claiming the tough talk was moving in both directions. On the evidence of what we’ve seen on-field, that is indeed the case and as long as it’s not spilling over into abuse, it may not be a bad thing.It shows that Bangladesh have come prepared for the mental battle as well as the cricketing one, and that South Africa take them seriously on both fronts. “I had a chat with Russell (Domingo) and he mentioned that he told them if they want to compete they have to get a little bit tougher. We’ve seen that from this Bangladesh side,” Maharaj said. “They are tougher than what we are used to. Test cricket is hard and as Dean said if you are going to play, you need to front up. They are a lot harder and tougher.”Siddons, who is new to Bangladesh’s coaching staff, confirmed that there has been a concerted effort to get the team to play a more attacking brand of cricket and take the fight to the opposition. “We’re trying to instill a fight in our team, not necessarily with our voice but in the way they play the game. I think the players have taken that on board.”Everything from the way Khaled started to the day, to the way Tamim ended it confirms Siddons’ view and means that in the end, the score really does matter more than those 20 overs of fun in the middle suggested.

Positive cricket and Australian coaches: how Rob Key's vision for England reboot might look

Autobiography provides insight into defining traits of England’s new MD

Matt Roller18-Apr-2022Rob Key was appointed as the ECB’s new managing director of men’s cricket on Sunday. A leading broadcaster for Sky Sports since his retirement from the professional game, Key has often been forthright in his opinions about English cricket and his new role casts a different light on his previous takes.As well as Sky podcasts and columns for the , Key brought out an autobiography two years ago, titled . He told ESPNcricinfo at the time that it contained “a few tales, and a few views on the good things and the bad things” about the game, but with several big decisions due over the next two months, some excerpts now read like Key’s own manifesto.

Coaching

Key has often been cynical about the value of coaches, to the extent that one chapter of his book is called ‘A Coach is What You Get to the Ground In’. He hinted earlier this year that he believes England should split the role in two: a Test coach and a white-ball coach.”Essentially, there are three types of coaches,” he wrote. “Those who have a positive influence, those who have a negative influence, and those who are neutral. While many coaches would like to see themselves as a positive influence, the truth is, such people are actually few and far between.”Key sees a major difference between coaches at county and international level, suggesting that Peter Moores struggled with the step-up because he failed to take into account that “he was dealing with elite players”. “An international coach is more of a manager,” he writes. “They don’t actually have to do much. In fact, they are better off doing nothing.”

Australian coaches

Key’s own career was influenced by Neil ‘Noddy’ Holder, the batting coach who encouraged him to keep his backlift high, and John Inverarity, who coached him at Kent. Do not be surprised if he hires an Australian as England’s coach.”Aussie coaches, with their ‘can do’ attitude, certainly offer a refreshing and powerful input,” he wrote. “They have the ability to set off little explosions in your head. When the fog clears, you see everything with absolute clarity.”Steve Harmison, Rob Key and Andrew Flintoff played significant roles in England’s 2004 series win against West Indies•Getty Images

Captain-coach relationship

Key will need to ensure that his new Test captain and coach do not clash. “[There is] one absolute truth about the captaincy/coach dynamic,” he wrote. “It’s imperative they’re on the same page.”He details the failings of England’s Ashes tour in 2006-07, and the shortcomings of Duncan Fletcher’s relationship with Andrew Flintoff. “[Flintoff] would still end up trying his very best to make sure that that partnership worked,” he writes. “The question is whether he had any give or take coming back to him.”I know how important co-operative thinking is,” he continued. “As Kent captain, I found Graham Ford a great coach to work with… we had a joint focus on taking the team forward. Because of our shared attitude to betterment, we never really had a clash.”

Test captaincy

Key was highly critical of Joe Root’s captaincy during England’s Ashes defeat and Ben Stokes is the early favourite to replace him. While some have raised parallels with Flintoff’s ill-fated stint as captain, Key’s own view of his close friend’s time in charge suggests that will not put him off.Related

  • England have found three good men; they need another two

  • Shastri: 'In India there is always jealousy and people willing you to fail'

  • Graham Ford emerges as key contender as England's new Test coach

  • English cricket desperately needs leaders with a vision for the game

  • Darren Gough 'surprised' by criticism Joe Root faced towards end of captaincy

“Fred was a better England captain than he – and many others – ever thought,” Key wrote. “The circumstances were tough… he simply couldn’t have picked a worse time to be captain of England. The team had gone from the perfect balance of 2005 to Saj Mahmood batting at number eight. It was always going to be 5-0. They were throwing stones at bazookas.”He is full of praise for Stokes, too, who would fit Key’s idea that a captain should be an inspirational figure. “Since the nightclub incident in Bristol, Ben Stokes has put so much into his game,” he said. “He trains so hard – harder than anyone around him, by a distance. Great talent delivers a focus. It did so for Fred in 2005 and is doing the same now for Stokes. Without the hardship, neither would have reached those incredible high points.”

White-ball captaincy

Key’s relationship with Eoin Morgan dates back to 2009, when he was captaining England Lions on a tour to New Zealand. “What I found was a cricketer who never missed a trick,” he wrote. “When the coaches asked who should be vice-captain, straight away I said Morgs. I saw somebody who wasn’t willing just to say what people wanted him to say.” They are unlikely to clash too much.

Style of play

Key favours an attacking style of play in Test cricket, which could spell bad news for Alex Lees, Rory Burns and Dom Sibley. “We accuse people of playing too many shots but as a batsman your only currency in the game is runs,” he wrote. “For some reason, we seem to be happier if people are out blocking.”I admire Trevor Bayliss because is a believer in positive cricket. His view is that it’s possible to defend positively as well as attack. That means committing to the shots, having purpose. Is scoring 10 in a hundred balls all right? I don’t know if it is.”Often players get blamed for losing their wicket by using an attacking mindset, as if they never get out while playing defensively. When Jason Roy was opening in the Test team… pundits were saying there are no good old-fashioned openers anymore. The fact is, we had already tried ten openers, most of whom were exactly that.”Rob Key captained Kent in their promotion-winning season in 2009•Getty Images

County cricket

Perhaps Key’s biggest challenge will be leading the ECB’s high-performance review into the domestic game. He has previously outlined a draft schedule for the English season featuring a one-day competition in April, a ‘best of the rest’ first-class tournament running parallel to the Hundred, and three divisions of six teams in the Championship.In , it seems he views the county game through the prism of England’s Test team, rather than something valuable in its own right. “Four-day cricket as a business is completely bankrupt,” Key wrote. “It makes no money and costs a hell of a lot to put on. Compared to other formats, it simply makes zero financial sense.”Championship cricket really has only one card up its sleeve. The TV rights for the game are linked to Test cricket, and Test cricket can only survive so long as there is a production line of players from the Championship.”County cricket exists only because of the money from Test cricket, the England Test team only because of the Championship conveyor belt. They are the ultimate odd couple: worlds apart, but unable to get divorced because they are so utterly reliant on each other.”

Brendon McCullum on his coaching philosophy: 'Respect the opportunity you have, go out there and do your thing'

New England coach on captaincy, culture and his ‘no d***head behaviour’ policy

ESPNcricinfo staff12-May-2022 All Out On his coaching philosophy
“One thing I want to see as a coach is I want guys to take what they feel is their best game out into the middle. I don’t want them to try and play my game or someone else’s game.”I want them to play the game that gives them the most amount of satisfaction because you get one crack at it and you want to know when your career has been and gone and you’re sitting back on your couch, the opportunities that you had, whether you take them or you don’t, you want to know that you did it your way.”On dressing-room culture
“I am big on culture as well. I think it can’t be a forced culture, it needs to be organic, but for me there are a couple of fundamentals and that’s you need to be on time and you need to try and play the game with a smile on your face and try and enjoy the experience that you’ve got and then all the pressures that come with it, I’ll try and alleviate some of those.”On his ‘no d***head policy’
“I think you sort of have to [have that policy], don’t you? When I say ‘no d***head’, I mean ‘no d***head behaviour’ – don’t do anything that’s going to land you on the front page of the Herald [the New Zealand newspaper], or don’t think because you’re a cricketer that you’re better than the people you walk past in the street.”Just be a good person, respect the opportunity you have as a cricketer, and go out there and do your thing. It’s fine to be different, that’s completely fine and that’s what makes this such a great sport too – trying to bring all these different characters together and try and come together for a common goal and a common cause.”Related

Hopps: Stokes carries wisdom of experience into ultimate England honour

Stokes calls for team of 'selfless cricketers' to revive Test fortunes

Brendon McCullum named England's new Test coach

Educated punt on Brendon McCullum offers England's Test team an overdue sense of identity

Key: White-ball teams must 'keep evolving'

On the importance of captaincy
“One of the other aspects I’m really learning as a coach is that you need to work with the captain [who] is the most important person in the team. They’re the most important person in the squad. You need to identify what sort of captain you have, identify how they want the team to play and what tactics and what direction and culture they want the team to look like.”Then, as a coach, it’s just trying to keep the squad constantly on the same path towards that vision and also just plug some gaps where the captain needs plugs. The communication between those guys will then allow the performance on the field to replicate the work and the discussions that you have off the field.”On friendships with players
“It depends on what sort of coach you are. I’m an authentic person. I believe in being yourself and I don’t mind being nice to people – that’s OK too. Just because you’re the coach doesn’t mean you have to be constantly jumping on top of people and saying ‘you’ve got to do this and you’ve got to do that’. I think there should be a level of respect there but also you need to have the ability at times to just make sure that you’re still ultimately responsible for the environment that you’ve allowed these guys to operate in.”I am a social type of person, that’s just me. I love being around people and having conversations and having a drink or a game of golf and talking about cricket, and I think it’ll be a really good challenge as well for me as a coach to see how that unfolds over the next few years and see if that strategy is right. I haven’t had any complaints so far so we’ll wait and see.”On mental health
“It is really important from a coach’s point of view to have an understanding of it and you’ve got to provide the resource because I’m no mental health expert. I can’t fix any issues that come up as such, you can be there to be a sympathetic ear but if people need help then you need to bring in some expert skillsets to actually assist those people.”That’s certainly something we’ve discussed in the teams that I’m coaching: do we need to bring someone in that can just be there just in case? Someone that people know if something is going on in their life, they can go and have a yarn to them and provide some expert resource around it – rather than someone like myself trying to put an arm round them and saying ‘she’ll be right, let’s crack on with it’.”On the divergence between formats
“I think the game itself is in pretty good order. Yes, there’s some areas that probably need some attention but it’s probably just been slightly recalibrated. I don’t see multi-format players are going to last, if I’m being honest. I think you’ll have a one-day team, a T20 team, a Test team and they’ll all have their own coaches and support staff and I think that’s just the nature of how it’s going to have to be.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus